Ooh, just came across this today. I really liked this logo… I did this back in 2012, if the date stamp is to be believed. I think this struck a nice balance between the letter “r” and the lambda (reversed, yes).
So, I’d like to do some statistical analysis. I hear that R is really good at this. Let’s download it and take a look.
(Ten minutes later)
AAAHHH! MY EYES! THEY’RE BLEEDING!
What about Matlab? It’s the same story.1 As a programming languages person, these languages make me … well, angry.
Well, after thinking about this for a while, it seems to me that what I hate most about these languages is their complete lack of a small semantic core.
is this all just library design? Most of the things I really hate can easily be constructed in any dynamic library through a suitable application of
Terrible Library Design (tm)
… except that when it applies to things like vector dereference, it feels like fairly ‘core’ syntax.
Example time! First, R does this crazy thing in distinguishing logical from numeric vectors.
1 2 3 4 5 6
> a  "a" "b" "c" "d" > a[c(2,4,3)]  "b" "d" "c" > a[c(FALSE,TRUE)]  "b" "d"
In the first of these two array derefs, we’re using the indices from the vector to decide what elements of
a to take. In the second case, though, the index expression is a ‘logical vector’ and is therefore tiled to the length of the original one, and used to decide whether to take the corresponding element.
If you imagine this as part of a language semantics, you’d see this horrible side-condition attached to these rules, where array deref’ing works in totally different ways depending on the kind of argument it gets.
To say nothing of the silent tiling, which seems like an open invitation to horrible bugs.
But wait, we can compound this problem with some nasty coercion:
> a[c(4,c(FALSE,TRUE,TRUE))]  "d" "a" "a"
What on earth is going on here? First of all, vectors get silently flattened, so that
c(3,c(4,5)) is the same as
c(3,4,5) — ugh — but then, the logical values are coerced into numeric ones, so the index vector that’s produced is actually
c(4,0,1,1), which is then used to index the vector
a. But why are there only three values? Oh, well, there’s no index 0, so let’s just skip that one, shall we?
Honestly, I guess the real problem is in thinking of something like R as a programming language; it’s not. It’s a statistical analysis tool, with a rich text-based interface. After all, would I get upset if Photoshop used ‘b’ for blur and ‘s’ for sharpen and I couldn’t nest them the way that I wanted, using parentheses? Probably not.
And finally: apologies for everything I’ve written. I’ve used R for about fifteen minutes, and this piece is really just me blowing off a small amount of steam. Not well written, not well thought-out. Meh.
Actually, maybe not; I spoke with a friend yesterday, and I get the impression that Matlab may not be as horrible as R, here. ↩
Well, it’s 10:47 in the morning, and everyone’s still alive.
This is only news because today was the twentieth running of the long island challenge granite mon thing, and everyone made it safe and sound.
As usual, we got up early; we met at the yacht club at 6:00 AM, which (I see) is actually an hour later than last year. In fact, we might well have started an hour earlier, as we would have had a wee bit more tidal assist and a wee bit less chop.
Be that as it may, it was an absolutely gorgeous morning, and the water was warm. Actually, if you must know, it was way too warm. Not for the swimmers, but rather for the aquatic life. I’ve been doing this swim for about twenty years, now, and the water just keeps getting warmer and warmer. I think it was 65 degrees, but apparently a few days ago Henry Becton recorded a temperature of 75 degrees. This is why all of our aquatic life is dying. Nice for human swimmers, though….
I think this might be a good time to give a shout-out to MERI, which has been monitoring the blue hill watershed since 2004, among many other projects. They report that the ocean temperature has risen by an average of 1.56 degrees celsius, which is … a lot.
So, the death of the planet notwithstanding, we had a really nice swim.
Here we are before the swim (apologies to Tricia, who is entirely hidden here):
Here we are after the swim:
From left to right:
- Alice Clements
- Henry Becton (didn’t swim, but he looks great in this picture)
- Charlotte Clews Lawther
- Tricia Sawyer
- Jerome Lawther
- Moira McMahon
- John Clements
- Samantha Lee
- Mary Clews
We would never have attempted this without the astonishing volunteers, including:
- Sara Becton
- Ethan Coit
- Kitty Clements
- Robin Clements
- Tom Clements
- Molly Cooper
- Henry Clews
- Amanda Herman
- John Jeffrey
- Deborah Miller-Little
- Wing Taylor
- Will Taylor
Following the swim, Charlotte and Jerome biked up to Millinocket, and the next day, climbed Katahdin. Guys, may I include your picture at the top?
Thanks to Wing and Alice for pictures. And finally, Alice Clements once again gets credit for organizing the event. Thanks!
Let me start by saying this: I can’t possibly be the first one to think about this.
I’ve been working up in Mountain View, this week. It was a great trip, and I stayed in a totally gorgeous little place. When I got home from work, I either went running or biking. After that, I cooked myself a small dinner, ate it outside, then went into my room to get a bit of work done or get ready for bed.
Macros are a wonderful thing. A hygienic macro system puts language extensions within the reach of non-compiler-hackers.
However, to date, most modern, hygienic macro systems are associated with languages like Scheme and Racket that are quite high-level. My claim is that macros are probably much more useful in low-level languages. Here’s why:
The student-run Cal Poly Solar Decathlon site is now online, at http://www.calpolysolardecathlon.org.
Check it out!
I’m sympathetic to Teachers’ unions. In fact, I’m in the Teachers’ union. More specifically, I’m a tenure-track associate professor at Cal Poly, and a member of the California Faculty Association.
Many of the faculty union’s actions I find commendable. In particular, I’m thankful that the union supports faculty wages1, and tries to ensure the continued presence of full-time faculty.
However, I find the union’s seniority rules pretty much indefensible. In particular, article 38.16 of the contract (Collective Bargaining Agreement) negotiated by the CFA with the California State University system (or CSU) stipulates (IANAL) that “The President shall establish the order of layoff for tenured faculty unit employees in a unit of layoff by reverse order of seniority.”
Why would this be the case? Is the administration presumed to be so incapable of estimating worth that this decision needs to be taken out of their hands completely? It appears to me that the current goal of the union is to demonize every aspect of the CSU administration’s activity. The level of the CFA rhetoric in its published materials is incredibly low; to take just one example, the idea of paying more money to certain employees based on their performance is described by the CFA as “Pucker Pay.” Please.
Now’s where I should launch into a detailed analysis of the history of labor laws and the role played by seniority layoffs… but I don’t have that background, or that time. If I could build a model using Redex and publish it in POPL, I’d be all over it. Instead, it will just be my opinion.
Here’s another part of my opinion: civil discourse is the basis for forward progress in our government.
I guess I can say this: I voted for Marshall Tuck.
1 though probably not mine, actually
What? There are no decimal time zones?
Okay, backing up.
I love time-wasting hard-to-learn idiosyncrasies. I use the dvorak keyboard, I run in sandals I make myself, I run my own mail server (surely the stupidest of my habits).
About two years ago I “invented” decimal time. Which is to say: I did in fact think of it myself. Unfortunately, there’s a bit of prior art here, going back to the French Revolution.
Short version: Our current day has 86,400 seconds in it. This is not really very far from 100,000. So… what if we just designated a decimal second as being 1/100,000 of a day? then we could have all of our hours and minutes be decimal divisions. More specifically: the day is divided into 10 decimal hours, each hour into 100 decimal minutes, and each minute into 100 decimal seconds. Works great! The decimal hours are quite long, but the decimal minutes are pretty close to our existing ones.
A brief diary of broken bicycle frames.
All dates approximate.
This list does not include broken axles or bent forks.
- 1998 - Diamondback entry-level road bike, broken in crash (my fault (I believe this is how I met Anika))
- 1999 - Bianchi entry-level aluminum frame, weld let go between down tube & head tube
- 2000 - replacement Bianchi (much nicer), aft starboard chainstay broke
- 2001 - Gunnar Cross frame, rusted from inside out after riding in Boston winter
- 2010 - Felt Hard-Tail MTB frame, starboard chainstay broke where it meets bottom bracket
- 2012 - Gunnar Cross frame, aft starboard chainstay where it meets dropout (re-welded)
- 2014 - same Gunnar Cross frame, same exact spot (time to look for a new welder)
- 2015 - same frame, same place, finally sent it back to Waterford to get a new dropout… and new paint!
Back in 2005, Cal Poly placed third in the Solar Decathlon… and there’s a movie, to prove it!
The Rahus Institute has graciously agreed to put their 2005 Solar Decathlon movie online. Here’s the first of three segments of the hour-long movie.